How are REITs Taxed? (Including Implications of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act)

Real Estate Investment Trusts were created in 1960 as a means of facilitating investment in commercial real estate. The fundamental benefit of structuring as a REIT is the tax-exempt nature of the entity. REITs are not subject to a corporate tax on taxable income distributed to shareholders, only on earnings retained by the company. While this fundamental element of REITs has not changed, the REIT industry and regulatory environment continue to evolve.

REIT dividends are taxed as one of three types of return:

The majority of REIT dividends are taxed as ordinary income, according to NAREIT. (REIT.com, 2019)

Implications of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act has made some significant changes to the REIT industry, including the following benefits:

Read how recent regulations affected REITs along with their future outlook.

Pros and Cons of REITs Taxes

Pros

Cons

REIT Taxes for Retirement Accounts

REITs are well-suited investments for retirement accounts, particularly retirement accounts with tax advantages such as 401ks or Roth IRAs. These accounts allow investors to defer tax obligations until retirement. The combination of REITs pretax dividends and tax-advantaged retirement accounts may allow investors to defer taxes for decades potentially. Investors have the ability to earn a greater return on high yielding REIT investments as the pretax investment compounds over time.

As shown in the chart above approximately 10%-12% of REIT are classified as return of equity, which offsets the investment basis, and would not be taxable to the investor until the original investment is fully returned. This would partially offset the tax benefit of owning REIT shares in an investment. Additionally, should the investor choose to withdraw the dividends before reaching retirement age the investor would be subject to ordinary income tax plus a 10% penalty.

REIT Taxation for Non-US Investors

Foreign investors are subject to withholding tax of 30% on REIT dividends regardless of the source generating the dividend. Some foreign investors may benefit from reduced withholding obligations as a result of treaties negotiated between governments. For example, Chinese investors are subject to a 10% withholding.

Foreign investors may be able to minimize or reduce their withholding liability through the portfolio interest exception if the REIT invests in debt. Additionally, REITs structured with less than 50 percent foreign ownership may be able to further mitigate the investor’s withholding.

However, should an entity structured as a REIT fail to maintain its REIT qualification it typically defaults to a C corporation which is subject to a 21% corporate tax rate. This presents risks to foreign investors in particular who would otherwise be able to avoid US federal income tax. (KPMG, 2019)

Conclusion

REITs provide an effective means of facilitating investment in real estate and distributing income to shareholders. Shareholders bare the majority of the tax burden in REIT ownership. This, however, offers shareholders the ability to manage the tax liability in relation to the rest of their investment portfolio. Which, for many investors, creates an opportunity for greater balance.

Legislation and market trends have continued to provide a favorable environment for REIT growth. The continued growth in the US economy, low-interest rates and growing demand for US real estate investment via both domestic and foreign investors are expected to continue for the foreseeable future and continue the favorable environment for REITs.